Psychiatrists and psychologists have higher incidence of mental illness in themselves!

-
Image
Psychiatrists and psychologists treat mental issues of their patients. But what about their own mental illnesses?  Psychiatrists and psychologists are more ill mentally  Doctors   are in great stress during their training as well as career period. The workload, busy and fast life schedules, and higher expectations and competitiveness and the nature of the job itself leads to a sense of exhaustion, both physical and mental. There is a heavy burnout. Moreover, time for socialization is almost nil.  Hence, doctors are in grave risk of suffering from mental health illnesses. And in this, psychiatrists and psychologists have a higher risk and incidence of mental health issues.  It is a sad truth that psychiatrists and psychologists are more ill mentally than general public or other doctors. This has been known but not accepted and recognised sufficiently.  Also, read: Narcissist mothers are non-loving and jealous of their daughters  Studies have revealed that psychiatrists and psychologists
Post a Comment

Immunity passports concerns medical fraternity and rights groups: The medical and ethical reasons against it

-

 There are talks in the USA, the UK, and in European nations that they would introduce COVID-19 immunity passports for travel to these nations. These are digital passports that are proofs that one has been vaccinated against COVID-19. But this concept and thinking has worried health experts and right group people. 

COVID-19 pandemic and the world 

COVID-19 virus started in Wuhan in China and has engulfed the world. The pandemic is seeing second and third waves and the USA, the UK, and the European Nations are currently in the grips of it. The cases are surging in these developed nations of the world and they are considering start of COVID-19 immunity passports. They plan to introduce these digital passports in order to ensure that those who travel to and from their countries are vaccinated against COVID-19. 

But this political move has upset the health experts and rights groups. These nations believe that introduction of such a passport might help their nations to recover from the onslaught of the virus on their economy. Once this comes in, they want to slowly relax all the public health precautions in place for the pandemic. They want it to be used for travel abroad and also in bars and restaurants. 

The weakened and badly-hit aviation industry is pushing the government to quickly put into practice this immunity passport system. 

President of the USA, Joe Biden has outlined a 200 page national coronavirus pandemic strategy and that includes the directive to assess the feasibility of a coronavirus passport. 

Immunity passports (Source: BBC) 

Immunity and coronavirus : Full details here! 

Boris Johnson of the UK has also ordered a review of such passports for international travel. 

The European Council is also meeting for discussion on these digital passports for movement across the 27 countries of the EU. IATA is also looking to have these passports on board before travel. They have called it the IATA Travel Pass. 

But why is this step not medically recommended? Why are the rights groups concerned on this politically-motivated policy of the government? 

Rethinking urged... 

As the developed and other nations are contemplating introduction of such digital passports to prove the COVID-19 vaccination status, public health officials and civil liberty organizations are not happy. One of the reasons for concern is that these passports would give people a false sense of security. Dr. Deepti Gurdasani, clinical epidemiologist at Queen Mary University of London states: 

"I can see that they might be useful in the longer term, but I have several concerns about them being considered at this point in time when I think the scientific evidence doesn't support them. And there are lots of ethical concerns about them that I think are legitimate," 

There is not enough evidence currently to say that all those who hold immunity passports are protected against the virus and are not of risk to others. There is the added problem of coronavirus variants in the UK, Brazil, South Africa and other nations and one is not sure yet whether the COVID-19 vaccines are effective against them or not. WHO is not in favour of vaccine passports yet. In its statement, it said: 

"There are still critical unknowns regarding the efficacy of vaccination in reducing transmission and limited availability of vaccines." 

The UN Health Agency also said: 

"There are still critical unknowns regarding the efficacy of vaccination in reducing transmission and limited availability of vaccines." 

Science in Emergencies Tasking: Covid-19 (SET-C) group at the Royal Society cited 12 issues in such passport implementation. They stated that the introduction has to meet the following criteria: accommodate for the differences between vaccines in their effectiveness and also changes in their efficacy against new and emerging Covid variants, it should be internationally standardized, it should be secure as regards the personal data, it should meet legal standards and also meet ethical standards. 

The ethical issues 

There are many countries of the world which have yet been unable to procure the vaccines. And hence implementing a compulsory immunity passport for travel would be a discrimination against these populations. Liberty of the UK said: 

"These so-called passports claim they would ensure those who can prove they have coronavirus immunity can start to return to normal life. Which raises the question — what happens to everyone else?" 

It will not be until 2024 that all people of the world would have access to COVID-19 vaccination. The organization added: 

"Countless suggestions for immunity passports have circulated. Some suggest their use would be limited to international travel — others are less specific. Meanwhile a variety of technologies have been floated, from QR codes to apps or even physical cards," 

"One thing every suggestion has missed is that it's impossible to have immunity passports which do not result in human rights abuses." 

The British democracy and rights group Big Brother Watch also said that privacy and free movement of people would be jeopardized with this vaccine passport introduction. Professor Melinda Mills, director of the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford opined: 

"We need a broader discussion about multiple aspects of a vaccine passport, from the science of immunity through to data privacy, technical challenges and the ethics and legality of how it might be used," 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Morton's toe: Everything you need to know about your longer second toe

-
Image
 Often, one notices that the second toe of some people is longer than the great toe. People say different things for it. Many of them say that it implies that the owner of such a longer second toe is a dominant, creative, energetic person in real life and very ambitious and peace and happiness-loving. But no one has tried to understand the reason, science, medicine and problems of having such a toe. It is called as Morton’s toe or Greek foot.  What is a Greek foot? Many people in the world have a longer second toe of the foot. Such feature may be on one side or in both the feet. It is called Morton’s toe or Greek foot. The other names for it are Morton’s foot or royal toe. But the reason is not the second toe is longer but the fact is that the first metatarsal below the great toe is shorter. Thus it is not due to the faulty phalanges but due to the difference in height of the metatarsals. Since the second metatarsal is relatively longer than the first metatarsal, the joint at the base
Read more

There can be no universal forgiveness! It never exists!

-
Image
Forgiveness or pardon means clearing off the feelings of resentment or revenge towards the offender. In most contexts it implies giving up any expectation of justice. People justify this act of forgiveness from a religious point of view and psychologists justify it as an act that would bring peace to the victim. But my experience tells me that both religion as well as psychologists are absolutely wrong in asking a victim to forgive the evil person. This act is bad from a society point of view and would lead to a rise in crimes and unhappiness. Let me explain in depth with examples. 1. I have a friend in the UK. She is originally from Nigeria. She has two siblings who are married with children and she herself is single and childless. In the year 2009, she had gone to her hometown. There her siblings tortured her physically and mentally and put her under house arrest. They did not want to give her any ancestral property and assets. She managed to free herself with the help of a friend an
Read more

Voluntary childlessness is on the rise in the world! What are the reasons for it?

-
Image
 The decision of couples to have no children by choice seems tough but is increasing in the modern world. Though society looks down at such couples, the availability of effective and safe contraception and old age support from non-family agencies has made things a bit easier for such decisions to be made.  Reasons for voluntary childlessness 1. Personal reasons such as not wanting responsibilities of a child.  2. The emphasis on career rather than reproduction 3. The lack of desire to forward one's family genes or line due to child abuse.  4. Anguish against existence in general. 5. Non-readiness to give up one's freetime and social time for children rearing 6. Happier to help others raise kids 7. Preferring a pet over a child 8. Not wanting to give up personal space and sharing it with a child.  9. Not happy with child-rearing things such as cleaning up mess, disturbing one's sleep etc. 10. Not particularly fond of children behavior. 11. In some situations, one partner alr
Read more